Fleming Andy-AFLEMING wrote: > Ah, I knew there was one more I needed to send a mail about. The 5040 > patch wouldn't apply anymore. Could you rebase? I was unable to > determine how to fix it.
Rebase again? Ugh. > The CRC patch met with fierce opposition, so I > haven't applied it. The only opposition was from Wolfgang, and he was opposed to our EEPROM format as a whole, not to our patch. He doesn't like the idea that the only way to know the location of the CRC is to first read the ID field. Scott and I explained to him that we don't control this format, we just implement it. So I don't think there is any reasonable objection to my patch. Please apply it. Without it, we have a broken implementation of the EEPROM parser, and *that* is not acceptable. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot