On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 08:52 +0000, Stuart Langridge wrote: > I think you might be under a bit of a misapprehension here. The thing > that you pass to the Python functions as a "doc" is a JSON string. It's > not a Python dictionary or some other complex type. Our basic "document" > is a string containing a JSON serialisation of the document; it's not an > object.
That is exactly what my complaint is. That 'doc' and every bit of data associated with it (id, revision, etc…) must be maintained and passed around as separate things. I am suggesting we should have a Document class, which contains all of these things in one place. A simple class, with properties for all these bits of data, which can be set/get in accordance to the conventions of the language for each implementation. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~u1db-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~u1db-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
