We couldn't make it reliable enough to depend on. We experienced about .5% loss of data and IBM wasn't able to help us get to the source of the problem before the customer decided to pull the plug due to the excessive cost of solving the last bit.
Maybe someone with a lot of deep internals experience or previous replication system experience could have gotten the job done quicker, but it isn't for the faint of heart. I would recommend waiting or looking at something like the RFS module which I believe is more robust (and more pricy). My biggest complaint was with the logging. There was no way to prove a successful xfer and doco/error messages were vague at best. Security issues were pretty scary as well. DanE > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave S > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:31 PM > To: U2 USERS > Subject: [U2] Unidata Replication > > > Any opinions on Unidata replication ? > > We are using Unidata 6.06 and are looking for honest opinions on the > replication feature. > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
