Nope. But just remember - nor is it required that the "D-Fields" were defined. The application can still write to those fields. Hopefully you haven't started to use fields that the application requires somewhere.
Good luck -- Colin Alfke Calgary, Alberta Canada "Just because something isn't broken doesn't mean that you can't fix it" Stu Pickles >-----Original Message----- >From: Brutzman, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:22 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: [U2] Adding D-Descriptors > > >At the bottom of a data dictionary having a few dozen >D-Fields, I added a >few more D-Fields. > >Inside a UniBasic application, end-users are able to read and >write data to >these fields. > >Sometimes though, when listing results, some flaky data shows up. > >I am writing to inquire...is there now a requirement to "normalize" all >records such that there are "blanks" specified in the newly defined >fields...for all records ? > >In other words, is it not ok to have a mix of records...some with 71 >fields...others with 75 fields? > >--Bill ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
