>>advantage over FOR...NEXT, that things have changed (since UV 9.6?) and >>the system is keeping track of where you are in the array in both cases. >This functionality was added to universe at revision 7.3.1 (january of 1993
>specifically). I'm running UV 9.6.1.3 on Win2000. My personal experiments indicate that there is indeed a huge speed improvement with REMOVE over FOR/NEXT when processing a dynamic array. If you are concerned then why not test it on your own version to see if it's an issue? When I have a dynamic array with multiple levels of separators, like @FM, @VM and @SM, I find REMOVE inconvenient to use, so I cheat and go with FOR/NEXT. Unless there are serious performance problems. Barry ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
