In a message dated 4/22/2005 7:29:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So, if you use MQ like a connection pool, that is not desirable > performance-wise, and is a breach of your license agreement. But if you use > it for applications to communicate (which is the purpose of MQ), you are > not violating the license agreement. Applications would send messages back > and forth as a result of something a user initiated and wasn't waiting for > an answer. I fill in a form on a web page to view an invoice, I click submit and now I'm waiting for the invoice to pop up. So in this scenario I am waiting for an answer. So is IBM's position that the only valid engine that I can use is Redback? If so, then why weren't the other four providers at Spectrum served with papers? Thanks Will Johnson ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
