In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 7/21/2005 11:59:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you are unwilling to open your eyes and mind to new things
(although REMOVE is not new), there is not much any of us can do. And I
thought I
was resistant to change. ;^)
I don't think you've been paying attention at all :)
I did not say I was resistent to change. I asked for a good example of why
you'd use REMOVE in place of READNEXT. If you're going to advocate a position
so strongly you should be willing to back it up
I can't give an example, but I can certainly give a situation ...
As somebody else pointed out, if you have a COMPLEX dynamic array,
REMOVE and READNEXT give completely different results. If one works, the
other will corrupt your data.
And as I said, I'd use REMOVE in place of READNEXT for clarity - I've
never known anybody use READNEXT :-)
Cheers,
Wol
--
Anthony W. Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the
thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man
lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998
Visit the MaVerick web-site - <http://www.maverick-dbms.org> Open Source Pick
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
