"Stevenson, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/22/2005 11:44:26 AM:
> Tim, > Was transaction logging or data replication used? You're not the first person to ask that. Unfortunately these were not part of the goals of this load test. > Can you share any interesting performance stats comparing w/ vs w/o TX > or DR? I don't have anything formal to share. We've done some testing, but don't have anything formal. Naturally, the overhead of these products is highly dependent on the nature of the application employed. Something that does a lot of updates will have a different performance profile than something that's heavy on reads. And large record/transaction sizes will create a large amount of logging and/or replication activity as compared with something that has smaller records and/or transactions. Tim Snyder Consulting I/T Specialist , U2 Professional Services North American Lab Services DB2 Information Management, IBM Software Group 717-545-6403 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
