Unfortunately, LIST-ITEM is just a raw record dump and does not display field names (just numbers) and does not apply the appropriate conversions for numbers, dates, times, etc.
I like letting REVISE build the @REVISE item- why not call it from a trigger whenever the dict is updated? Or you could probably make an I-type VOC item called ALL or @ALL that parsed the dict and displayed all the fields in a pretty way- but that's still a lot of work to re-create something that UD already does for you. /Scott Ballinger Pareto Corporation Edmonds WA USA 206 713 6006 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:43 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword? Would LIST.ITEM be an answer ? At least it lists all the fields... -- mats ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
