John, Pardon me, but I want to be sure I understand this exactly. I want to be clear whether you & I saw the same thing or the opposite.
I saw: - corrpuption in my data file, with text from SYS.MESSAGES written in my data file. - SYS.MESSAGES iteslf was NOT written to & was NOT corrupt. You saw: - corruption in UV's SYS.MESSAGES. SYS.MESSAGES itself WAS written to and WAS corrupted. - Your own data files were not corrupted. (but were expected updates missing?) Did I get your half right? If so, can you tell what data was written to SYS.MESSAGES? Was it something that was supposed to be written to your own data file? > From: John Kent > we dont run transaction logging. > ...I am guessing that its the edi routine thats causing this > problem And I figured it was TxLg. Now I'm thinking yours & mine are related and its neither edi nor txlg. Your edi & my como corruption probably both involve i/o to OS flat files, fwiw. > but the error message suggests that and there is only > one read only file on the system that i know of.. > > If anyone knows how to reproduce those error message i would > like to know as i have tried everything i can think of me too. CDS ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/