> Is this a limitation on I-types in SQL selects? It would seem so based on your report. What does support have to say?
> Has anyone come across this problem before and is there a work around? I haven't, but I haven't tried large orderded SELECTs on four I-types. > Alternatively, can someone suggest another way to do this using a single > ReVise statement? You said you could do it in RetrieVe; are you sure you can't use TOXML with that? I've used TOXML with LIST in 10.0.4 ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
