A single-process, not multi-threaded, I take it...
On 12/29/06, John Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UDTSORT CPU usage may the result of a single process? There are tools on
www.sysinternals.com which may give you pointers on "who is doing what to
whom" here. It will take what it an get until done...
There were changes in the desktop heap usage from 6.0 due to issues with
desktop heap utilisation (private desktop) - console messages :
"udtsort.exe: Initialization failed"
Are you getting these or anything in the event logs?
I've seen a few oddities with the desktop heap in relatively recent Windows
2003 versions and now routinely turn off "interact with desktop" flags on
UniData services so it is possible there is an issue there. If you can
compare this on Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 would be useful information -
at lease on Windows 2000 you can tune the heap:
HYEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/ System/ CurrentControlSet/ Control/ SessionManager/
SubSystems/ Windows ;
entry SharedSection
Regards
JayJay
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jjuser ud2
Sent: 28 December 2006 23:45
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2]UniData and Multithreading for udtsort.exe on Windows
Server 2003
Anybody?
On 12/22/06, jjuser ud2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and four slow
> processors(~700mhz) in a server. It is running Unidata 7.1.
>
> udtsort.exe caps out at 25% CPU usage -- it never exceeds this.
> Because there are four processors, this leads me to believe that it is
> completely using one of the processors. Is the 25% a hard-coded cap
> of some sort, or is it simply not multi-processor capable? If it
> were, would it try to use 100% of the processors? If one processor is
> fully utilized and there are two udtsort.exe instances running, does
> the second one try to use the next available processor? SB+ users are
> unable to function efficiently when udtsort.exe is running at maximum
> capacity(read: unable to so much as bring a screen up), and this leads
> me to believe that perhaps they're not multi-processor aware as well.
>
> Is there some sort of setting that I can change to enable that? Or is
> server 2003 not capable of it? Or am I just hallucinating again?
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
