I'm doing this on my test box right now and it is workgroup "WG  WINDOWS
XPPRO UV". I don't see that it works even when I write a quickie Uniobjects
wrapper. Interesting. I'll follow up with ibm support and see what the deal
is.

Thanks everyone. I'll post the outcome whatever it may be.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:25 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe & Phantom


David:

Device licensing is an extra cost on U2 Server edition.  It's free on
Workgroup (less than 25 licenses) and Enterprise editions.  It only works if
you're using an IBM product or AccuTerm or, maybe, some other MV emulator.

I think David is right about the master phantom.  I've written one too.
It's probably not as good as others but it does get the job done.  If you're
interested I'll post it.

Bill 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 3:20 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Universe & Phantom
>
>Thanks Dave, but I still think getting device licensing
>working is the way to go (maybe). I've reinstalled my license
>on the test system, but I can still only telnet up to the user
>count, rather than the device count. Has anyone else
>experienced this issue on UV10.2.0 on windows?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David A. Green
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:42 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Universe & Phantom
>
>
>David,
>
>What I did was to write a Master Scheduler Program that runs
>as a phantom and phantoms off the background processes when
>it is their time.
>
>Thanks,
>David A. Green
>DAG Consulting
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:20 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Universe & Phantom
>
>These are all good suggestions, but the issue is I cannot tell
>if the job failed due to an out of licenses condition. In the
>old days it was easy, if the process was not attached to a
>terminal device, it was construed as a phantom and didn't
>consume a license. (or at least that's the way I remember it).  
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to