I have seen some slight performance degradation above 4 indices. I usually
recommend that you have no more than 6, but 5 or even 6 can be ok, in a pinch.
So the answer is that you're approaching the point where there will be a
measurable negative impact on throughput. The complete answer is test it & see
if the performance hit exceeds your tolerance level.

Defining the indices as NO.NULLS helps a lot (I've had folks tell me that they
_had_ to index on null values. I'm unconvinced that there's much value in that
unless only a tiny percentage of the records will have a null value in the
field).

With a dynamic file that large, I'd also be looking for ways to minimize split
operations. Usually, I'll see a very high percentage of writes doing splits
when a dynamic file is that large - and those are expensive writes. You may
want to make sure that MINIMUM.MODULUS is not less than CURRENT.MODULUS, and
increase it with an ample growth factor. Of course, if you're running in 32
bit mode, you may not have any wiggle room left there, and may want to look
into converting this into either 64-bit or a distributed file.> Date: Wed, 12
Sep 2007 11:39:09 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]> Subject: [U2] Does anyone know the effect of
adding an ndex to a UniVerse file?> > Does anyone know the effect of adding an
index to a UniVerse file?> > I'd like to add a date index to a type 30 file
with 11 million records. (> ANALYZE.FILE Total size .................
2,115,325,952 bytes)> > Would this have any measurable speed slowdown on
applications running> against the file?> > The file currently has 4 other
indexes.> > -- Louie Bergsagel> Seattle> -------> u2-users mailing list>
[email protected]> To unsubscribe please visit
http://listserver.u2ug.org/
_________________________________________________________________
Can you find the hidden words?  Take a break and play Seekadoo!
http://club.live.com/seekadoo.aspx?icid=seek_wlmailtextlink
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to