I don't know about perl, but I am *guessing* that would work. An
early solution (circa 1997/8) was to use a little program written in
C to do the same thing. I've have to search my records or the list
archive to dig that out.
But it begs the question, why not just use PHANTOM? Are you assuming
some doubling of processes or overhead that really isn't there? I'm
not understanding why you would think hammering the process grp id is
preferable to letting PHANTOM take care of it for you.
Maybe I'm missing a nuance here.
--
Regards,
Clif
On Dec 15, 2007, at 5:33 PM, John Godzina wrote:
Hi Cliff,
Can I also simply wrap the UV process in something that changes the
pgid? (e.g.: the setpgrp command in perl)
John
Clifton Oliver wrote:
That is the reason for having the cron script use the PHANTOM
command.
- Clif
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:46 PM, John Godzina wrote:
I'm not sure, but wasn't there some discussion a while back
stating that
multiple UV processes initiated via cron would be fine if each
process
had their own unique process group id (not just a unique process
id)?
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had
a name of john.vcf]
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
