Couldn't help but notice it was written without the += and -= constructs.
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:43:58 -0500 > From: dlaan...@hubbardsupply.com > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] Is this worth rewriting? > > This is some old code that I didn't write, so please don't use it for > anything profitable ... > > > > The proposal to the group is: Due to the repeated references deep into > the PARMS tables, if this were rewritten to reference these locations as > few times as possible, IN YOUR OPINION, would there be a significant > improvement in the performance of this subroutine? > > > > All in favor of rewrite, say AYE > > All opposed, say NAY > > > > (I'm testing some U2UG-Denver skills) > > > > MONTHLY.USAGE: > > > > CM=MONTH+LY.CNT > > FOR M=1 TO 12 > > IF PARMS(12)<101,CM>#'' OR PARMS(12)<133,CM>#'' OR > PARMS(12)<134,CM>#'' THEN > > > > CUM(M)=PARMS(12)<101,CM>+PARMS(12)<133,CM>+PARMS(12)<134,CM> > > END > > IF PARMS(7)<100,CM>#'' OR PARMS(7)<101,CM>#'' OR > PARMS(7)<102,CM>#'' THEN > > > > IF PARMS(7)<100,CM>#'' THEN CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(7)<100,CM> > ELSE > > CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(12)<101,CM> > > END > > IF PARMS(7)<101,CM>#'' THEN CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(7)<101,CM> > ELSE > > CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(12)<133,CM> > > END > > IF PARMS(7)<102,CM>#'' THEN CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(7)<102,CM> > ELSE > > CUMO(M)=CUMO(M)+PARMS(12)<134,CM> > > END > > END > > CM=CM-1; IF CM=0 THEN CM=24 > > NEXT M > > RETURN > > > > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
