Not skirting anything. The 1st line of my 1st reply ... "consider everything inside the DC proprietary and confidential". You ignored that line apparently and decided to focus instead on the article was about the infrastructure and then changed from db technology to programming language in your reply. The point was the same, such information is considered P&C, and is WSJ level news when companies decide to do otherwise. I was simply pointing you did the exact same type of switch when you replied. 1) It is a security issue for the issues that a few of have pointed out whether you want to accept it or not. 2) NDA's are enforcable against the signer. And most company's have much larger legal budgets than ex-employees. 3) Hosts (I've more than a decade of experience in that industry) WILL remove your site if it causes them issues. You mentioned PHP... I know a large company (you've used their websites I bet but no I won't say who. I didn't sign an NDA, but respect their wishes) that changed the extension attached the php interpreter JUST so to as not advertise that fact to minimize the exposure.
>>> <fft2...@aol.com> 4/12/2011 12:33 PM >>> In a message dated 4/12/2011 10:25:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ropor...@ochsner.org writes: > PHP isn't a database... apples and oranges. > It's the same point. The point you're skirting :) The specifications of a particular implementation, are not the same thing as just the fact of the implementation. At any rate, all the companies in my list have publicly declared. So it's all a moot point isn't it? _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
