On 22/07/11 17:46, Holt, Jake wrote: > I would say SQL, etc. is no different than U2 when it comes to document > management. Its all the tools around the database that is going to help > get the job done for you. Use the database you know best :) > > ** > > The filestream option in sql server is designed specifically for this > task.
But how does it manage things "under the hood"? That's the BIG problem with all relational databases, and one of the places U2 scores - it does NOT hide implementation detail behind a "you don't need to know this" flag. It's easy to store all the documents in a type 1 file, and then manage the metadata elsewhere in U2. Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users