I just tested starting multiple phantoms at the same time and it still 
increments the time field, er, weirdly. [UV/aix 10.2.4 Pick flavour.]
These phantoms were started at the same time from a paragraph (well, within a 
few milliseconds of each other) which output time() from a basic program 
containing milliseconds and recorded in the ActualTime column.
The date and time columns are based on standard I descriptors
Notice how the time field gets incremented by character position by ascii 
character! Basically, the mayor of WTF just comes in and wanders all over town.

&PH&............... Date...... Time.... ActualTime
RUN_38979_16040      30 NOV 11 10:49:39 38979.7990 [38979 start time]
RUN_3897:_16040      30 NOV 11    3897: 38979.8394 [3897: st char(+1) in 1s 
column]
RUN_3898:_16040      30 NOV 11    3898: 38979.8829 [3898: previous char(+1) in 
10s column]
RUN_38:8:_16040      30 NOV 11    38:8: 38979.9209 [38:8: previous char(+1) in 
100s column]
RUN_39:8:_16040      30 NOV 11    39:8: 38979.9593 [etc]
RUN_49:8:_16040      30 NOV 11    49:8: 38980.0065
RUN`49:8:_16040                04:27:20 38980.0337
RUO`49:8:_16040                04:27:20 38980.0841
RUN_38980_16040      30 NOV 11 10:49:40 38980.1185 [and starts to cycle again 
EITHER from previous + 1 or actual time if it is different to start time as 
this case!]
RUN_38981_16040      30 NOV 11 10:49:41 38980.1797
RUN_38991_16040      30 NOV 11 10:49:51 38980.2151
RUN_38:91_16040      30 NOV 11    38:91 38980.2644
RUN_39:91_16040      30 NOV 11    39:91 38980.3398
RUN_49:91_16040      30 NOV 11    49:91 38980.3786

Cheers, stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Boydell, Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 10:01
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] I-Type question in &PH&

Also, be aware that the format of the &PH& IDs may change when there are 
several phantoms which start at the same time (I don't know if this behaviour 
may have been fixed - I reported this in 2005).

After the normal: RUN_61985_13557
the following entries are like:
RUN`72:85_13557
RUO`72:85_13557
RVO`72:85_13557
SVO`72:86_13557


-----Original Message-----
From: 
u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org>
 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org]<mailto:[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org]>
 On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 09:04
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] I-Type question in &PH&

Yes, you are right.

It should be:

0001 I
0002 FIELD(@ID,'_',3)
0003 D4-
0004 Date
0005 10R
0006 S

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, George Gallen 
<ggal...@wyanokegroup.com<mailto:ggal...@wyanokegroup.com>>wrote:

> There is also a problem with the field mask
>
> In information flavor it would be 10R and S on the next attribute Is
> it supposed to be R then 10 instead of 10 then R?
>   By looking at the output, something in the mask is not right.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org>
>  [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org>]
>  On Behalf Of Wjhonson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:58 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org>
> Subject: Re: [U2] I-Type question in &PH&
>
>
> Third field, not second field
> FIELD(@ID,'_',3)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Thompson <jthompson...@gmail.com<mailto:jthompson...@gmail.com>>
> To: U2 Users List 
> <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org>>
> Sent: Tue, Nov 29, 2011 1:54 pm
> Subject: [U2] I-Type question in &PH&
>
>
> So I thought I would build an I-type to get the date of the &PH& items
> in niverse so I could more easily purge them...
> The item id looks like so:
> AUTOMATED.UPDATE.REO_23400_15641
> The friendly manual says that the item id is:
> hantomverb_time_date
> So my I-type looks like so:
> 001 I
> 02 FIELD(@ID,'_',2)
> 03
> 04 Date
> 05 10
> 06 R
> And of course, I have not put in the conversion code yet...
> The output of the I-type is this:
> ID......................................
>            Date......
> AUTOMATED.UPDATE.REO_23400_15641         234000000.0
> What am I missing?
> Shouldn't Date be 15641?
> --
> ohn Thompson
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org>
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>



--
John Thompson
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org>
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users



_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org<mailto:U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org>
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users




_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to