> From: Lunt, Bruce > Could you show us a comparison of times using your methods? It'll take a while to do that, sorry. I'm just testing this functionality in the latest version which will be available for U2 in a month or so. But I will be publishing before/after performance data as part of the encouragement for existing NebulaXLite users to upgrade. As noted below, so far the results are dramatic, from over 30 minutes down to close to 30 seconds, all due to the overhead of building large items. Half of the time I spent on this after initial testing was trying to figure out why the numbers were wrong - and they weren't.
I was just informed that the technique I'm using may have been published somewhere but I don't know if that was something I published without detail or if this knowledge is more widespread than I thought. Please forgive a bit of overzealous posturing if that's the case. For my next trick, I'll invent fire. Oh it has? Never mind. How about water? Really? Dangit! Fusion? There's even Fusionware? Is nothing left uninvented or reinvented in this industry? :) T > From: Tony Gravagno > Sort of OT: > My NebulaXLite product builds XML files that can get into tens of megabytes. > Concatenation with either method described below can cause this > process to take 1/2 hour or longer. I developed a technique that > reduces build time of these large blocks down to seconds, and no, this > isn't a method that has been discussed in public before. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
