Not data... links. IMHO, the main force of a data modeling tool, isn't to show you the data in each table, it's to show you how the tables link to each other.
So what I was saying in the below snip, is that any missing links, probably aren't important, and the tool should just map what it sees, ignore what it doesn't see. You can then have exceptions. To me that's a lot easier than createing an entirely other structure and the need to keep that in sync with the base structure -----Original Message----- From: George Gallen <ggal...@wyanokegroup.com> To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Sent: Tue, Jul 16, 2013 11:23 am Subject: Re: [U2] UML mapping tool for MV (UniVerse) Not so, not so.... We do not put dict names on our files that reference any kind of credit card information. So if someone is List dicts, it won't jump out at them, there could be information worth taking a look at. What we have been doing, is we have a Word Template, and keep our file layouts that way (full layouts). -----Original Message----- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UML mapping tool for MV (UniVerse) I would suggest that any link that is not already defined clearly in the dictionary is probably unimportant at any ra _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
