Title: Message
Just curious. Are Distributed files handled by the OS or the programmer. One client of mine had 12 monthly files (2-3 million records each) and the software combined the data into work files for cross-month queries.
 
thanks.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: Distributed & multipart files [as RE: [UV] Resize - Dynamic or64 bit?]

Hi Stuart,
 
One large advantage (from my perspective) is the ability to address the file as one large file or as an single part individually. The open statement in the program is the same, only the name changes.
 
The ability to put the parts on different file systems, balancing the load is another that springs to mind. The ability to split a file into manageable chunks is another. Some of our tables are starting to stretch toward the 20Gb mark and to split these into manageable chunks makes for reasonable resizing times etc. The individual parts can be resized at different times.
 
The ability to split your data according to your own algorithm is especially useful.
 
With multi-data part files, I don't believe you could address the complete file as one, other than that, the other points I have made are still applicable. I suppose distributed files are easier to deal with from the application point of view. If your distribution algorithm is reasonably well balanced the records will be placed evenly over the individual parts. Even if they are not, eg. you use say, a branch code as the key,  you don't have to worry about opening up the correct multi-part, the system will automatically do that for you.
 
Regards
 
David Logan
Database Administrator
HP Managed Services
139 Frome Street,
Adelaide 5000
Australia

+61 8 8408 4273
+61 417 268 665

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Boydell
Sent: Friday, 30 January 2004 8:57 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Distributed & multipart files [as RE: [UV] Resize - Dynamic or 64 bit?]

I have never come across distributed files in a system and they sound a lot like multiple part files (like SYS.HELP,XXX).
What is the difference / advantages / disadvantages between using distributed files and multiple data-part files? Can a distributed file also be a multiple part file?
Cheers,
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David T. Meeks
Sent: Friday, 30 January 2004 07:50
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: UNCLASSIFIED RE: [UV] Resize - Dynamic or 64 bit?

Actually, a DISTRIBUTED file is largely a logical construct.  It is a
collection of normal files under the umbrella of a master logical file.
The components of the DISTRIBUTED file (also called a PART file) can be
any hashed file type.

The file type that has DATA.30 and OVER.30 is a DYNAMIC file.

Dave



**********************************************************************
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************


_______________________________________________
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to