>Isn't the simplest response ... to point out that ANY >logical argument starts from assumptions, and therefore there is no >choice but faith, the only choice is where to place one's faith? >[Many people do] not realize the >depth of implications of that statement. > >(ps - replace "faith" with "heuristic" and you [can derive >a computational architecture compatible with your metaphysical >stance.])
- Laskey's wager Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Ross D. Shachter
- Re: Laskey's wager Ian Holmes
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Laskey's wager Jonathan Weiss
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager David Wolpert
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager Denver Dash
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
- Re: Laskey's wager David Wolpert
- Re: Laskey's wager Anonymous
