Re: interesting...

[Anonymous]

>Now here is an interesting statistical fact!

Actually, I should not have said that without going back and classifying
all the messages I've received and tallying them.  I was basing it on my
impressions, which are of course notoriously unreliable.

That's why we need science.

I will go back and tally.  You'll hear from me.

What's your prior probability on whether and to what degree my impressions
were distorted?

Kathy