Argh, that's unfortunate. Ubiquity 0.2 has a number of architectural differences from the 0.1 line; could you try the latest 0.2 preview and let us know if that behaves any better? I don't suspect it should, but at this point it'll be easiest and fastest for us to fix this performance issue in the 0.2 line.
- Atul On 1/3/09 9:50 AM, (Me) wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > I never got to use 0.1.3; it upgraded me straight to 0.1.4 today. I'm > using the default skin. I use KDE, and the Serenity Qt style, and the > gtk-qt-engine package as well, though I doubt that has anything to do > with it. > > Let me know if I can help fix this. > > On Jan 3, 10:29 am, "Alexander Biggs"<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Kenneth: By same here, did that also include using Ubuntu with Firefox >> 3.0.5? >> >> Both: Did 0.1.3 run at normal speeds, and what skin are you guys using? >> >> I'm on Firefox 3.0.5 with Windows Vista SP1 and it runs normal for me. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Kenneth Jacker<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> [email protected]: >>> >>>> Contrary to the 0.1.3 changelog, 0.1.4 is excruciatingly slow compared >>>> to 0.1.2. I'm using Ubuntu with Firefox 3.0.5. When I start typing a >>>> command into Ubiquity, it takes 3-5 seconds for each letter I type to >>>> show up >>>> >>> Same here. It has essentially become unusable ... :( >>> >>> -Kenneth >>> >> -- >> o-o; >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
