It's a fairly high priority to banish the hyphens from Ubiquity. Jono is working on a blog post outlining the plans for "container verbs" and will hopefully have something implemented soon after that.
-- aza | ɐzɐ -- On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Blair McBride <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, its still alive. No time frame on it getting done, however. > > - Blair > > > > > On 16/01/2009 6:00 AM, Edwin Khodabakchian wrote: > > Yes. Thanks for the pointer to the container verb ticket. It would > > definitely help organize the namespace better. Does anyone know if > > that thread is alive? > > > > On Jan 14, 2:09 am, Blair McBride<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Forgot to mention: this is a good case for container verbs. Seehttp:// > labs.toolness.com/trac/ticket/134 > >> > >> - Blair > >> > >> On 14/01/2009 8:13 PM, Edwin Khodabakchian wrote: > >> > >>> We could the problem is that if you have share-on-delicious, feedly- > >>> share, etc... and you start to type sha then you get a list which > >>> looks heterogenous and seems harder to scan/navigate. I am not a > >>> usability expert and I am not sure which approach is easier. I will > >>> try to start with document Atul asked for with a set of use cases and > >>> examples and let people have open conversations and weight the pros > >>> and cons. -Edwin > >>> On Jan 13, 10:47 pm, Blair McBride<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Or you could use both names! Commands can have synonyms like so: > >>>> CmdUtils.CreateCommand({ > >>>> name: "feedly-search", > >>>> synonyms: ["search-on-feedly"], > >>>> ... > >>>> }); > >>>> - Blair > >>>> On 14/01/2009 9:11 AM, Edwin Khodabakchian wrote: > >>>>> Thanks Fernando. I think I agree and I will go with the feedly-XXX > >>>>> pattern for the first iteration of our commands. We can listen to > what > >>>>> users say. Note: As a user, I think that I can leave with either > >>>>> approaches but it would be nice if there was consistency. Currently > we > >>>>> have share-on-delicious and search-ebay. I will follow Atul's > >>>>> suggestion and put to a page together so that people can discuss this > >>>>> issue. -Edwin > >>>>> On Jan 13, 9:43 am, "Fernando Takai"<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> Ummm. we don't. > >>>>>> imho, you should name them as easy as possible - for example, > instead of > >>>>>> search-this-on-feedly try: feedly-search (i like when the devs put > prefixes > >>>>>> like feedly-* or rtm-*) - this (maybe) will make it easier to do the > >>>>>> container verbs (i.e. search this on feedly). > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Edwin Khodabakchian< > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> Is there a document describing some best practices for naming > >>>>>>> commands? For example I am wondering if we should use feedly-search > or > >>>>>>> search-on-feedly, feedly-share or share-on-feedly, etc...? > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Edwin > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Fernando "Takai" > http://flickr.com/photos/supeertakaihttp://fernandotakai.jaiku.com > >>>>>> Get Ubiquity:https://ubiquity.mozilla.com > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
