I agree that there are still issues to be resolved with the so-called magic words. However, I think the underlying problem should be solved in Ubiquity, rather than have commands come up with their own independent fixes (which will vary between commands), as the inconsistencies would be more confusing.
Of course, fixing Ubiquity is easier said than done. - Blair On 4/02/2009 7:42 AM, Charlie wrote: > If I missed noticing they are available already, please point me to > the direction. > > So recently I came across the problem with magic word of "it" being > replaced by selection automatically, see other's complaint here: > http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox/browse_thread/thread/de046801daa478fd/15dec9f707592ce6?lnk=gst&q=it#15dec9f707592ce6 > > Now I am thinking could ubiquity just expose the user input api > without any parsing around, of course the default input could be kept > as it is without any change. > > And the selection is already available through CmdUtils.getSelection > (), I believe it's good and necessary to get the direct user input as > well (or even set as SetSelection is possible) > > > Thanks, > Charlie > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
