It's on our roadmap. In fact, it's what i'm trying to do right now ;D On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Endolith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's got source code, description, reviews, ratings, discussions, > sharing links, and tags for each greasemonkey script, and you can list > yourself as a fan of a certain script variant or flag a script as > harmful. > > I think most of this stuff could be built into the Herd as well. If > there are 5 different variants of the same command (and we should > encourage this kind of branching and evolution of commands), then we > need ways to identify which ones are better than others without > necessarily reading through the source code of each one. > > I think pairwise rankings would be better than individual "1 star out > of 5" ratings for each command, though. > > "68% of users find Last.fm command A to be better than Last.fm > command B", for instance, but then Last.fm command C comes along and > 99% of users vote it as better than both A and B, because it combined > the best features of each. Then everyone will know which one to > subscribe to. Then if the next revision of A incorporates the > features of C and adds some more, that revision gets marked as even > better... > > > -- Fernando "Takai" http://flickr.com/photos/supeertakai http://twitter.com/fernando_takai Get Ubiquity: https://ubiquity.mozilla.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
