And on that note, has anyone done a "backhaul bakeoff" lately? I'd like to know what kind of performance (and cost) is available out there these days!
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Mike Hammett <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net> wrote: > There's a plethora of WISPA vendor members that make (or sell) licensed > links. Few people have anything bad to say about any of them. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Robert Haas" <rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com> > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 1:56:59 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > That is what I'm thinking Mike, I've already shot an E-mail off to Pete @ > SAF to start looking at some licensed gear. > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 1:12 PM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > > > You're not going to find much that'll do better than 100/100 at that > distance without going licensed. Maybe the PTP600\650? Anything AC based > with appropriately sized dishes will and will likely also work in 5150. > However, a 100/100 customer should be generating $1,500-$2,500/month, so > maybe a licensed link is in the budget? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > [image: http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png] > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png] > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png] > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png] <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Robert Haas" <rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com> > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 1:06:34 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > Thanks, sounds like I need to look towards a different solution. > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org > <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 11:59 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > > > As long as it has good line of site and 5.8ghz is clean enough, it should > work fine. According to the built in link calculator, it should be able to > do 149.76Mbps using 20mhz channels at 13 miles... if you need more than > that, you can use wider channels, but that's going to be using pretty much > the whole 5.8ghz band. > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on > behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] > *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 11:35 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > http://www.balticnetworks.com/wireless-calculators > http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/airfiber/airFiber_DS.pdf > > Guessing 20 dB of Tx power, you should be able to maintain that if you > have low noise. AF5 won't work in 5150. DFS won't reach that far, so you > have to use 5.8. > > For areas over -88 noise it probably won't work well. If noise permits, a > 10 MHz or 20 MHz channel will give you 100/100. If you can make 8x > modulation, 10 MHz should be fine. For each lower modulation, you'll need > the next bigger channel (roughly). > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > [image: http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png] > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png] > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png] > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[image: > http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png] <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Robert Haas" <rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com> > *To: *"ubnt users" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 11:25:27 AM > *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] AF5 distance > > Would an AF5 be able to supply 150/150 (true throughput) @ 13mi? > > > > We have a customer requesting a 100/100 connection who is 5 miles from one > of our tower sites. Our site is currently 3 hops from any of our fiber fed > tower sites. With some redesign work and a mile or two of fiber I can > shorten that to a single 13 Mile hop but I'm wondering if I can use an AF 5 > for that hop and get the needed throughput. > > > > Thanks, > > Robert Haas > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- -RickG KyWiFi
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
