Good news! The >200 SSID buffer issue has been fixed in v5.6 beta 6. Tested
on a Rocket M5, been running solid for 15 days.

Thanks Team Ubnt. We are excited to add a select few, previously unusable
UNII-1 frequencies to our scan list!


Colin
  netBlazr <http://netblazr.com/> - free your broadband!


The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand. The ordinary
telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull the tail in New York, and it
meows in Los Angeles. The wireless is the same, only without the cat.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Matt Hardy <m...@ubnt.com> wrote:

> To follow up on this thread, we found the issue. This wasn't really a new
> bug introduced in v5.5.10, but with the additional frequencies the customer
> was seeing > 100 new APs broadcasting in the UNII-1 band (probably lots of
> indoor APs). There's a limit of 200 APs the radio can pick up when doing a
> scan, if the radio is in an area with > 200 broadcasting SSIDs, it causes
> this issue (on any firmware) and device stops performing as expected.
>
> We'll be increasing the limit in v5.6, but in the meantime there are
> workarounds: scan list, different channel bandwidths, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Phil Curnutt <pcurn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a Scan List set?  Cut the number of channels it searches down to
>> a minimum.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> XW is different.... than XM.
>>>
>>> On 10/28/14, 12:35 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>> > So they say, yet when XW 5.5.10 was placed on XW Ti hardware, the gear
>>> > went nuts for a full 24 hours before we tried 5.5.6. When it was just
>>> as
>>> > bad, I went to 5.5.10rc3... same issues. 5.5.10rc2? Everything went
>>> back
>>> > to normal. It wasn't just one piece of hardware either, the same
>>> > symptoms were noticed on 4 different APs.
>>> >
>>> > They can say nothing changed all they want-- something changed, there
>>> > were 3rcs, a final, and now tons of bug reports on 5.5.10.
>>> >
>>> > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
>>> > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
>>> >
>>> > On 10/28/2014 05:05 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> >> You know there were no changes made to XM v5.5.10 other than adding
>>> new
>>> >> frequencies, right?
>>> >>
>>> >> On 10/27/14, 8:57 PM, Colin Zwiebel wrote:
>>> >>> We are having serious problems with v5.5.10 with 5GHz XM hardware and
>>> >>> have decided this firmware is not production ready. We using *v5.5.10
>>> >>> only for links that require UNII-1* frequencies and avoiding in all
>>> >>> other situations. There is some sort of a bug with scanning for
>>> >>> available networks, so if your area has few networks, you might
>>> observe
>>> >>> different behavior.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/v5-5-10-major-bug-no-SSIDs-in-scan-print-scanning-info-buffer/m-p/1072997#U1072997
>>> >>>
>>> >>> *AirOS v5.5.10 is not production ready!*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ubiquiti, it appears you have a major bug and need to revoke the
>>> >>> release, remove from website, until you get this fixed.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We have now had 3 clients -- 2 Nanobridges and 1 Rocket M5 --
>>> disconnect
>>> >>> from their AP with the same behavior: NO SSIDs appear in scan list.
>>> >>> Downgrade to v5.5.8, no changes to config, radio once against sees
>>> SSID
>>> >>> and connects perfectly.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> *Workaround: Frequency Scan List*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I cannot fully confirm this, but it appears, v5.5.10 plus frequency
>>> scan
>>> >>> list has this problem less. It also might be that this pares down the
>>> >>> amount of data coming from the atheros driver (by not scanning all
>>> >>> frequencies), and scan list doesn't actually fix the issue, just
>>> reduces
>>> >>> the scan data to something that doesn't break the radio.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> *iwlist ath0 scan -- print_scanning_info: buffer too large(65535) for
>>> >>> realocating*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In our most recent incident, I was able to SSH into the failed
>>> v5.5.10 STA
>>> >>>
>>> >>> XM.v5.5.10# iwlist ath0 scan
>>> >>> print_scanning_info: buffer too large(65535) for realocating
>>> >>>
>>> >>> XM.v5.5.10# wlanconfig ath0 list scan
>>> >>> ioctl[unknown???]: Argument list too long
>>> >>> wlanconfig: unable to get scan results
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We are running now with a frequency scan list (cannot downgrade this
>>> >>> radio) and both iwlist and wlanconfig commands are working properly.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> More details:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> APs: Problem happens with both Nanostation M5 APs and PowerBridge-M5
>>> APs
>>> >>>
>>> >>>   - Seen with AP on v5.5.10
>>> >>>
>>> >>>   - Seen with AP on v5.5.8
>>> >>>
>>> >>> STAs: Problem observed with NB-22-M5 and Rocket-M5
>>> >>>
>>> >>> DFS: Problem observed on both DFS and non-DFS frequencies (5805)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Most recent incident, Rocket was working fine for a few days,
>>> suddenly
>>> >>> died. It rebooted in the process (only 2min uptime when I got to
>>> >>> it). Let sit 10min, rebooted, made no difference, gave buffer too
>>> larger
>>> >>> error no matter how many reboots. Only enabling scan list patched it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Colin
>>> >>>   netBlazr <http://netblazr.com/> - free your broadband!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand. The ordinary
>>> >>> telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull the tail in New York,
>>> and it
>>> >>> meows in Los Angeles. The wireless is the same, only without the cat.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> >>>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to