I don't know why they have not but I am thinking when it comes to the large packets of a ipv6 network, there may be some issue with sharing the air time. Sure you can tunnel ipv6 over it and it will get chopped up with MTU but Native? Doesn't that imply that over a wireless network you wont be chopping packets with a MTU and if so how do you share the air time? I know when we were testing some time ago with NATPT we had issues with MTU's messing up tunnel and had to drop MTU sizes over our wireless to support the large packet and when you do that your overhead gets even higher. What happens when you have no MTU?
*Alex Phillips* CEO and General Manager RBNS.net HighSpeedLink.net *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)* *WISPA President (2015-2017)* *540-908-3993* On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am i the only person that thinks its strange that manufacturing a device > that doesn't natively support/have ipv6 built in is borderline wreakless > and crazy.... > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment > 866-680-8433 Toll Free > 480-287-9960 Fax > http://www.video-direct.tv > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
