+1000
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 06:08, Mike Hammett <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > Coordination? Liz and only Liz. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > From: "Chris Soiles" <csoi...@riocities.net> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 6:50:02 AM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM) > > I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem is the cost of frequency > coordination, what is everyone doing for coord? > > Doing it yourself? > Any hardware vendors absorbing some of it, making it affordable? > Any kind of subscription type consultants, x$ per month and you get x number > of assistance to spread out the expense? > > Sent from iPhone 6S Plus > > Chris Soiles > Owner > Rio Cities > csoi...@riocities.net > 505-966-6389 > > On Apr 13, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Mimbres Communications <mim...@sw-ei.com> wrote: > > Waking up a bit late here as well, and we're *seriously* rural (second least > populated county in the sixth least populated state in the nation). The > power company and the mine both have all manner of dual-pol 40 MHz links on 6 > GHz and 11 GHz running hither and yon. 400+ mbits full duplex to a > substation? Sure, why not? > > AF-11FX at 56 MHz just meets the 101.147 efficiency requirements for an 80 > MHz channel at 256 QAM. Engineer your links at 1024 QAM and you can probably > secure the channel. Upgrade that to 4096 QAM on the full 80 MHz in a few > years and you're golden. > > The rules are probably due for a re-work at some point. The traffic loading > requirements are ripe for a legal challenge and I suspect somebody's likely > to pull that lever in the next few years. > > > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> >> wrote: >> "Conserve Spectrum" .... >> "Waste of Resources".... >> "Spectrum Efficiency"..... >> >> Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ...... >> >> When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about >> spectrum grab..... >> >> My advice to you all newbies.... get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum >> channels you can get and put up the radios that you can afford that will >> chew up the whole channel.... you can always get a better radio in the >> future (or when you can afford it).. but very surely you may not be so lucky >> in finding extra spectrum when you need it in the future.... >> >> Doing anything less, is very likely to endanger your future business well >> being..... >> >> Can me whatever you like........ >> But take it from someone who is waking up to this rather late.... i.e. >> virtually impossible to find 6ghz paths, virtually impossible to find 11ghz >> paths, and 18ghz are going fast too... BTW, we are in Rain Zone N.... which >> means only 11ghz & 6ghz are practical for any reasonable distance... >> >> (BTW in our area, no 3.65, no CBRS, sprint is sitting on 2.5....ahhh !...but >> we can use 24Ghz & 60Ghz & EBand !!!!! ) >> >> >> ..... you think your industry peers are going to play nice with conserving >> spectrum ' !!! Think again... >> e.g. http://about.att.com/story/att_to_acquire_straight_path.html >> Follow the bigger story starting with the FCC & Straight Path ... >> > > -- > Kurt Albershardt | Mimbres Communications, LLC | 575-342-0042 > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
