Please remove me from the list
Aram Ter-Martirosyan
ConnectTo Communications
555 Riverdale, Suite A
Glendale, CA 91204
tel 818.546.4601
fax 818.546.4617
From: ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Monarco
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:14 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
Please remove me as well
Scott
From: ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hilliard
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 1:32 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
Please remove me as well..
Thank you
Christian Hilliard
On May 8, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Blake Darling <blake@completecommunicationsinc.com> wrote:
Please remove me from this thread/group…..
Thanks,
Blake
Blake Darling
President
801 647 1111 Office/Cell
866 566 3827 Fax
Blake@completecommunicationsinc.com
www.completecommunications.com
http://lnked.in/completecommunicationsinc
Check us out in Enterprise Networking Magazine 2016 SDWWAN Top 10 Companies!
http://www.enterprisenetworkingmag.com/vendor/article9/completecommunications Digital Magazine Link:http://www.enterprisenetworkingmag.com/magazines/May/2016/
On May 8, 2017, at 12:10 PM, James Wilson <james@ridgecomms.com> wrote:
Odd, UBNT called 6.0.4 beta when they announced it a non-beta forum...
We've installed 6.0.4 in a few APs and STAs in both bridge and router mode and haven't run into any problems.
On May 8, 2017 2:07 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" <j.vankort@oregononline.net> wrote:
So, we can assume v6.0.4 is beta and we are the test subjects? Can we expect a report from whoever is daring enough to deploy?
Jan V
On 05/08/2017 10:52 AM, Ridgetop Networks wrote:
There were issues with stations refusing to reassociate until the AP was rebooted up to 6.0.3. So far so good with 6.0.4 for me, but it was infrequent enough in 6.0.3 that I can't confidently say it's fixed in 6.0.4.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:59 AM Jan-OOLLC <j.vankort@oregononline.net> wrote:
was the report of an 18dBm drop in RX an error with v6.0.3?
Jan V
On 05/08/2017 08:47 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
6.0 was a double edge sword, it did improve some PtMs, but was dropping clients randomly. Not seeing that with 6.0.3.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net <troy@byhalia.net> wrote:
I am on 5.6.15 for both XM and XW. So far working well. Waiting on feedback from others on final version 6 updates to use as I did not see good results when I tested 6.0 so staying clear for now.
Troy
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Jan-OOLLC <j.vankort@oregononline.net>
Date: 5/8/17 11:22 AM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
What is the safest best release to use as of right now?
Jan V
On 05/08/2017 05:33 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> wrote:
Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop in modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not purely cosmetic.
We are late adopters here, so no experience.
On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright <nick.bright@valnet.net> wrote:
v6.0 is said to have disassociation problems.
I tested v6.0.3 on several sites with a mix of XM/XW (mostly XM) 2.4GHz hardware. Mostly RM2 AP units, some BulletM2 units. Mostly AirGrid and PowerBeam SMs.
It was stable, with no disassociation issues, but we had a non-trivial number of SM units exhibit a *significant* drop in RX signal strength - but it was not consistent across the AP. We also showed experimentally that restoring that one SM unit back to 5.6.15 (leaving the AP unit at 6.0.3) restored the signal strength to the previous level. Some clients lost as much as 18dBm RX strength.
We chose to go back to 5.6.15 at that point.
On 5/6/2017 5:49 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:I sent him XW and XM, if anyone else has other versions, send them over.
Daniel Peoples
Resonance BroadbandResonancebroadband.com
918-429-3620
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo <emejia@webjogger.com> wrote:
We have currently using v5.6.6 and want to try v6.0.3, was told that v6.0 was more stable.
Does someone have the v6.0 firmware?
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
--
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users