Wow, that's truly ugly.
It would help if we had some knobs for the rate algorithm. If we could set thresholds and times required (separately, to move up and down) I think we could craft a sane auto mode that worked with local conditions. On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Randy Cosby <dco...@infowest.com> wrote: > We recently came across a similar situation. The previous ISP was using > low modulation rates as a way to limit the customer bandwidth because they > lacked any other mechanism for doing so. So a customer with a 10M commit > rate plan was being set to MCS1. 20M got MCS3, etc. > > > > So wrong. > > > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller > *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:17 PM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] why limit the mcs rate ? > > > > > > ok, i'd buy this. but i'd say 80% of the clients were "fixed" to the > lowest modulation. > > there are a few i could understand this being done for. > > thanks Jonathan - I did not think of that. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Jonathan Taylor <jtay...@wisouth.net> > > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:11 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] why limit the mcs rate ? > > > > I would do this on fringe clients with low signal so it would stabilize > the modulation. When the modulation jumps around the throughput was worse. > > > *Jonathan Taylor* > > *WiSouth Networks, LLC* > > jtay...@wisouth.net > > *(334) 595-9521 <(334)%20595-9521>* > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:06 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > > > We have a 2.4 network we recently acquired - in going through some of the > radios - we find several of them have > > Max TX Rate locked in at MCS 1 - auto is unchecked. > > > > I've never seen a configuration like this nor have I ever heard of it > being done. > > > > Why would someone do this? What possible benefit could this have been? > > > > I think it is related to interference mitigation but several of the > clients I have undone this setting on are already modulating > > much better (obviously) > > > > thoughts? > > > > Thanks :) > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
