Upstream forward: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/6089
Thanks Nick, I tested your patch in a PPA and it worked. I forwarded it to Debian, but it looks like they may just remove the package anyways. My response should appear here shortly: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063434 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063434 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063434 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu 389 Directory Server, which is subscribed to 389-ds-base in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052578 Title: 2.4.4+dfsg1-1 is FTBFS on armhf in Noble Status in 389-ds-base package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: build fails with: ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c: At top level: ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c:429:26: error: unknown type name ‘off64_t’; did you mean ‘off_t’? 429 | bdb_seek43_large(int fd, off64_t offset, int whence) | ^~~~~~~ | off_t The source properly detects when to define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE but I think this is an ordering issue of the define and a standard library header include. I can recreate this on an armhf machine by including <stdio.h> before the LFS define. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-ds-base/+bug/2052578/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389-directory-server Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389-directory-server More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
