Eric S. Johansson wrote: > as I was constructing my response, and was almost finished when it hit > me about what's wrong with the model proposed. it is the equivalent of > raw natural text. Full function natural text sucks a little bit. The > broken, unable to correct consistently, natural text is horrible and > ruins voice models. What you're proposing has even less functionality > than a broken natural text.
I'm sorry, that was too harsh. I was interrupted by one too many things while I was writing that bit and I forgot to go back and edit it. Again, I apologize for being careless. today might be a day to stay away from the keyboard unless I'm writing code. :-) --- eric -- Speech-recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct some. -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
