On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:01:19PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote: > Upon reflection, one thing I noticed that apparmor and other system > hooks would lose from direct access to the manifest would be the > contents of the Framework; field. I'm not sure how significant of a > loss this is... for apparmor, we do encode a policy version field in > the security structure in an attempt to cope with future iterations > of templates, course-grained permissions, etc. and still have older > applications/versions install and work unchanged.
You can still do this if you need to. Find the base unpack directory using the algorithm in my previous e-mail (or a suitable click command once one exists); then read $BASE/.click/info/$PACKAGE.manifest. My gut feel is that needing the full manifest will be fairly rare. If it turns out not to be, I can add a helper to print it given a path within an unpacked package, which should solve this problem. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
