On 07/25/2013 09:33 AM, Ted Gould wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> I got the feeling that it might make sense to think about this and maybe >> make the conscious decision to not support this. There are a few reasons >> which might make this attractive: >> >> - security issues regarding X mitigation > > It seems like the only security issues are those that would say we shouldn't > ship Unity 7 at all :-) So supporting Click there doesn't add or subtract. >
I disagree. Click packages by themselves could be supported, sure. It is the unreviewed code in the appstore that is the problem. I think it would be unwise to let desktop users install arbitrary code on their systems via click packages from the appstore without display server mediation. > >> What's your take on this? Does anyone have click-packages-on-the-Desktop >> as a strict requirement? Does anyone feel strongly about supporting this >> (apart from a testing standpoint for app developers)? > > I think that we should support Ubuntu as a converged platform. > Yes, me too, but only when it is actually converged or when we can properly support it when we are not yet converged. -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
