Hello, On 25.06.2013 16:58, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Holbach > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is this maybe something we should document in >> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppStore/FutureIdeas >> >> or something along those lines? Is the above consensus? >> >> Is "generate an empty package with the same name, but a higher version >> number" we'd like to script? > > > The way I (conveniently) see it is that we'll use blank packages for > the time being, and have a goal to replace it with something a bit > less hacky as soon as possible. We'd need to document what the proper > way would be to be able to pick that up as soon as someone's plate > looks a bit empty.
Judging by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppStore/Goals plates are generally looking quite full. Still some open questions remain and it might be good to find some agreement on them For now: - upload empty package with higher version - should/can this be scripted somehow, so it'll be easier for somebody in the review team to take care of this? - where do members of the review team find out the list of malicious apps? Later: - on whose plate is this going to land? - will a possible script to generate empty click packages "just" be used on the server side and exposed through a button or the reviewer in the UI? Have a great day, Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
