bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png
Suzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Am Samstag, den 15.04.2006, 23:38 +0100 schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:No, the logo doesn't look good small but I also prefer it over a foot. I used this
> bvc wrote:
> > For consistency, the distributor-logo.png needs shadow.
> > http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png
> Good point. But I wonder if the Ubuntu logo will ever look great that
> small? Maybe we should revert to the Gnome foot there? Thoughts?
>
> Mark
>
No Gnome foot. I think the logo with the shadow looks great.
http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/theme/ubuntu/icons/gnome-main-menu.png
with clearlooks-6x/breezy/hoary. Of course the same could be done with ubunulooks and the flat logo. I personally thought having an actual button there was a better indication of it being a menu. I'll throw it together, see what it looks like, and post a screenshot.
refresh your browser if you do not see 3 panels
I think it sets it apart nicely but to be honest, I don't think a lot of people will like it. Thoughts?
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
