hi,
On Sa, 2006-07-22 at 12:34 -0700, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 21:26 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > hi,
> > On Sa, 2006-07-22 at 12:16 -0700, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
> > > My only thoughts are that it would seem a colossal task
> > > to try and get _three_ full looks included. What
> > > are you encompassing by a look when you suggest those
> > > three?
> > >
> > well, we already have three ;)
> >
> > there is "default" , "young" (which is the same as default with a more
> > kid oriented wallpaper) and "plain" (which uses the same metacity and
> > gtk theme, no wallpaper a all (plain color) and the tango brown iconset)
>
>
> Sorry for my ignorance on the Dapper release Oli.
nah ... :)
>
> I would suggest then that perhaps considering the size
> and scope of that, a summary of strengths and weaknesses
> combined with a visual slate for reference would be the
> best starting point.
i think thats what lisa is doing atm, she started a survey in the
edubuntu community to find weaknesses with the dapper themes and to
collect opinions about targets for edgy :)
ciao
oli
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
