On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:02 +0100, Who wrote: > AICs (and Mark, if reading): > Is there any chance of Edgy + 1 looking like this (or Edgy, but I > guess it is a little to late for that)? I am aware we are comitted to > Gloss as a result of Human - but I think this clean look 1)allows us > to use the more warm, friendly browns (for gloss I find I tend to have > to use orange or caramel, but that could just be me), 2) is divergent > from Vista, XP and OSX and 3)is easier to convert to a > wallpaper/GDM/Usplash (I.E _large_ things) than a completely glossy > design. >
Clearly the whole point of having a development procedure is such that you don't jump ship mid stream. We set our goals on very attainable targets, and thus far we have made good progress. Remember, as of a month and a half ago we had a sum of _zero_ real focused artwork team people. We are developing a base. Our design cycle can accommodate all of your concerns if they are * Given the freedom to choose * Suggestions are recorded in the proper phases. While I completely agree with all of the complaints regarding gloss, it was in our development plan and we should consider sticking to it. Again, this entire cycle is very experimental. I can't stress this enough. If people hit the ground running, all of these sorts of considerations would be resolved in "Ponder". Sincerely, TJS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
