On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Send ubuntu-art mailing list submissions to
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-art digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Reversion to Dapper Artwork (Matt Zimmerman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:16:23 -0700
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Reversion to Dapper Artwork
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Toby Smithe wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 18:53 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > Before you react - consider for a moment that the REST of the
> > distribution does not run that way.
>
> Although coding is an art, this art is a different beast. What makes you
> think it should run /the same/?
Because both the code and the art go together in the same package to produce
the final product. If the art is late, it hurts the entire effort. We're
feeling this right now as the development team rearranges the final stages
of the release process to account for more last-minute artwork changes.
This cannot continue to happen in the future. Artwork must be delivered on
time and according to requirements in order to be included.
--
- mdz
------------------------------
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
End of ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 16, Issue 42
******************************************
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
