Alexander van Loon wrote: >> > Besides that, is there anyone who prefers the Human iconset over >> > Tangerine? The Human icons don't look professional at all, it looks >> > blurry and ugly. From what I understand from previous posts on the >> > mailing list, the only reason the Human iconset was created because >> > sabdfl/Mark Shuttleworth likes them.
Once again, that silly word 'professional' pops up. This is a subjective terms and relative strictly to your vantage. It also, in this case, happens to be rooted in a rather poor judgment call. The icons were designed by IconFactory -- the company that also happens to have a rather vast resume including creating output for such little known corporations as Microsoft. Your complaints are aesthetic, and you _might_ have people who agree with you. That said, if you predicate your complaints based on terms that try to legitimize your complaint as something more than an aesthetic argument, not many people are likely to listen. To answer your question, Mr. Shuttleworth has stated that his aesthetic disagrees with Tango / Tangerine's. While some view his stance on the icon selection as dictatorial and within his rights (sabdfl -- remember?) he is certainly not alone on the dismissal of Tango / Tangerine on aesthetic grounds. Hope this helps... TJS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
