Yeah, I'm agree with you. I have the same opinion about Tango icons. The people at Iconfactory seems that followed the Tango guidelines. We have to discuss if we want to take these Ubuntu icons and go further or try another options(hiperrealistic icons, more Tangoish, etc..). I'll post some ideas the following 10 days.
Cheers. Álvaro. 2007/11/7, Can K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > What do you think of this icon set: > http://art.gnome.org/themes/icon/759 > > It contains only a few, but i really like the folder icon. > > > > (sorry if i have sent two mails, but i'm a bit confused by mailing lists) > > That's even worse than the current icon set! I've a question to all of us: > Is Ubuntu bound to the Tango guidelines? From my point of view, they're > quite unprogressive for a modern Desktop OS. Tango icons always look too > much comic-like and childish (in fact, this is a good criterion for Tango to > be the default look of Edubuntu). Can't we just release from the Tango > dogmas and create something different and new (but yet regocnizable as > Ubuntu of course)? I don't think this will be possible if we still stick to > Tango! Or will there be no discussion about this topic...? > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
