I agree the wiki needs a bit of a shuffle too. Below the link farm to all the various user pages should be sections containing lists such as 'Interface Themes', 'Wallpapers', 'UI Concepts' etc. This way you can easily see whats what and whats new - provided they are sorted by date. Maybe even some thumbnails?
It's a wiki anyway so I suppose anyone can do this. If there are no objections I may even do it at some point tomorrow? Sumit Chandra Agarwal wrote: > I do like that idea of cycling through wallpapers in the alphas. The > alpha needs default wallpaper anyway, so why waste it on old designs > when it is basically a no-risk chance to experiment? > > I've only just gotten involved with Ubuntu and for a new participant it > is extremely confusing and difficult to figure out where to start. I > guess much of this comes from the nature of a community effort, but I > feel things could be bit more centralized or organized. For one, the > Wiki could use better organization and perhaps even pruning. Looking at > the Hardy wallpaper section there it is ambiguous what the section > 'alternate' means. Does it mean 'alternating from what has already been' > or 'alternate packages for user download' or 'alternate preloaded > wallpaper library'? Once within the 'alternate' section those pages and > documents that are related to guidelines and design specifications are > given equal weight, and thus buried alongside, those pages that are > abandoned tests involving platypuses (platypi?). > > Not to get off-topic, but how can we better organize the art and design > efforts? I ask this specifically because it is where we are most likely > to draw in new non-technical participants and those not already familiar > with the open-source process. > > -Sumit > -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
