Philosophically it certainly makes sense. More difficult is the question of how exactly it would work. (RED) works by allocating a portion of sales revenue to the charity. With Ubuntu being free, does that mean Canonical would need to donate a percentage of their services revenue? Would Canonical agree to such a thing?
-Sumit Brian wrote: > Okay, so I don't know if anyone checks the brainstorm here, but I > posted one (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6200/) about getting > Ubuntu involved with (RED). Since it seems there's a fair amount of > interest, I figured I'd go ahead and see if I could get some people > involved. =] > I would really love to make this happen, and I don't really know who > to talk to and ask about this, so I figured I'd stop by here first and > see if anyone wanted to help (RED)-ify Ubuntu. xD > > I made kind of a logo, if anyone wants it. :] > http://i28.tinypic.com/fpbhg3.png > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of > Blockbuster Total Access > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47523/*http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com>, > > No Cost. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
