On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 20:42, Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Distinctive: No other OS looks like this BUT it doesn't break >> usability.... I.E it's unique and usable... All elements (with the >> possible exception of the menus that really need an outline if you >> want to use them without a shadow-porviding WM) > > If by "usability" you mean "the ability to use", I'll have to disagree. > There is no way a mainstream distribution should sacrifice basic > accessibility for aesthetics. In case you didn't get what I'm hinting at, > it's the razor-thin scrollbars and scale sliders. >
Also, it's weird that the active/inactive colours are inverted in the window's border and in the applications panel! The white text is the title of the active window... but the text of the inactive windows in the panel! It's confusing... The colours are nice, it's a good theme, but too specific to be default : it can be hated as much as it can be loved! Yann
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
