On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 20:49 +0200, Kim Kahns wrote: > Well, an active tab is active. I think that's why they called them > active in the first place. > Am I something missing here?
I meant: it's nothing you interact with. That's why I think it should be far away from looking like a button. > > Looking at the short breadcrumb buttons, the darker lower corners make > > the buttons look busy/dirty to me. Wider buttons are OK, allthough I > > wonder what strange lighting conditions / surface would result in > > such a > > look. > > > > Maybe you could explain that further because the corners of buttons > don't change (pixel wise) if the get wider or decrease in size. That highlight on the bottom of the buttons follows a bow. On short buttons the change in brightness to the corners looks more drastic. Maybe text reaching close to the ends also plays a role. Anyway, to me things look smudged there. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
