Rico Sta. Cruz wrote: > - It's chaotic -- as an OS default, I was thinking it'd be nice to have > something a little more subtle. >
It doesn't have to be default. I wouldn't make it default either. > - It's not well polished -- as Thomas has pointed out, the wood background > would benefit from having a little less presence. > What's stopping you from working on it? ;) > - It's a little too dark -- As an OS default, I think something more > vibrant is in order. > See above. > - It's trendy -- It's not a 'timeless' piece, it's something that looks > cool because it takes advantage of recent graphic art trends/cliches. > That's the point of wallpapers being tied into a release theme/name. I don't see an issue with this. > IMHO, I'd rather see a default wallpaper that's clean and subtle -- perhaps > even just a plain photograph, or something like dust/smoke as pointed out > earlier. > > I'll try to see if I can give it more polish and be more worthy of the > Ubuntu brand, and also try to see if I can provide higher-resolutions of > this. What do you guys think would be ideal? 1680? 1920? :) > Do *not* care about default. (have you read the list lately? :)) Just make a killer Ibex wallpaper. :) For Studio, I require 2560x1600 (16x10) where I can. I'd like to see that. Maybe a 1600x1200 (4:3) as well. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
